Gambling has long been a popular pastime in the West Midlands, but before the era of World Cup bets, residents engaged in a far grimmer form of entertainment: rat baiting. This brutal “sport” involved dogs being pitted against dozens of rats in violent contests that drew huge crowds.
In the mid to late 1800s, rat baiting was more popular than darts. Historians Richard Pursehouse and Ben Cunlife have delved into historical archives to reveal just how widespread and brutal this pastime was in the region. Spectators placed substantial bets on which dog would kill the most rats within a set time.
Famous rat baiting dogs became local legends. Pincher reportedly dispatched 500 rats in under 30 minutes, while Billy eliminated 100 rats in five and a half minutes back in 1825. Rat suppliers like Bill George operated as the sporting world’s equivalent of agents, providing the vermin for these grisly contests.
READ MORE: New Motorhome and Campervan Parking Restrictions Take Effect in England on July 6
READ MORE: Britain First Comes to Birmingham — But Hate Won’t Solve Our Problems
Interestingly, rat baiting gained traction after the 1835 Cruelty Act banned dog fights involving bulls and bears, but notably excluded vermin like rats. Nonetheless, the legality of rat baiting was frequently challenged, and pub landlords faced court for permitting such bloodsports—though fines usually targeted the betting rather than the baiting itself.
West Midlands newspapers were filled with dramatic accounts of ratting sweepstakes. For instance, an 1864 report from the Birmingham Post detailed a contest at the Broad Street Tavern, where a dog named Jacko killed seven rats in under a minute. Months later, another event at the Anchor Tavern featured dogs competing fiercely, with prizes awarded to those killing the most rats in less than two minutes.
Though popular, the sport was controversial. In 1879, the landlord of the Crown Inn in Sedgley was prosecuted after undercover police witnessed open betting on a rat baiting match. Despite conflicting testimonies, the court ruled the offense proven and fined the landlord, condemning the event as a disgraceful exploitation during times of widespread poverty.
Legal clarification came in 1871, when a Liverpool court ruled that while killing rats was acceptable, organizing and betting on such matches was not. This decision underscored the fine line between pest control and cruel spectacle.
Other pub landlords in the Midlands faced similar charges throughout the late 19th century. Alfred Halliwell, who ran the Hearty Good Fellow pub in Dudley, and Juba Charley, landlord of the White Hart in Halesowen, were fined for hosting rat baiting events. Eyewitness accounts describe crowded rooms, wire pits, and the gruesome sight of dogs tearing through scores of rats for sport and profit.
Although rat baiting faded into obscurity, remembered today as a brutal page in local history, it once captivated thousands with its savage spectacle—reflecting a very different cultural attitude toward gambling and animal welfare.